India’s health inequality made worse by reduced health budget: Oxfam report

Oxfam India’s inequality report draws attention to the county’s unequal healthcare story hit further by Covid-19

Topics

Healthcare sector | India health budget | Oxfam


Veenu Sandhu  | 
New Delhi 

When it comes to healthcare, people in general category are better off than Scheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST) households; Hindus are better off than Muslims; the rich do better than the poor; men are better off than women; and the urban population fares better than the rural.

These are the findings of Oxfam India’s “Inequality Report 2021: India’s Unequal Healthcare Story”. The report says that the absence of universal health coverage has starkly and disproportionately affected marginalised groups at a time when socio-economic inequalities in India are growing because of the Covid-19 pandemic.

While 65.7 per cent of the households belonging to the general category have access to improved, non-shared sanitation facilities, only 25.9 per cent ST households have better, non-shared sanitation facilities. Also, 12.6 per cent more children are stunted in SC households than those in general category homes. And, the chances of a child dying before the age of five are three times higher for the bottom 20 per cent of the population compared to the top 20 per cent. The Oxfam India report also finds that institutional births and access to food supplements under the Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) are 10 per cent less for Muslim households as compared to Hindu households; and 8 per cent less children are immunised in Muslim households.

Covid second wave and health inequalities

The disastrous second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic further exposed the weakness of India’s public healthcare system. The National Health Profile (NHP) in 2017 showed that there is only one government allopathic doctor for every 10,189 people and one state-run hospital for every 90,343 people.

At 0.5, the number of hospital beds per thousand population in India is lower than some of the lesser developed countries such as Bangladesh (0.87), Kenya (1.4), and Chile (2.1).

Constant underfunding of the public healthcare system in the last decade has worsened health infrastructure, the Oxfam India report shows. The number of hospital beds per 10,000 population between 2010 and 2020 reduced from nine to five. Currently, India ranks 155 out of 167 countries on bed availability and has five beds and 8.6 doctors per 10,000 of its population. Rural India, which makes for 70 per cent of the population, has barely 40 per cent of the beds, the report shows.

chart

This failure had a devastative result when the second wave of the Covid-19 pandemic struck: By May 2021, one in every two cases was in the rural areas, with states like Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan having 75 per cent of their cases in rural areas.

“Persistent underfunding of (the) public health system, especially primary health care and inadequate health infrastructure in India remain to be addressed by the government even after (the) devastating second wave,” said Amitabh Behar, CEO, Oxfam India.

Health across gender, caste, income

While India’s overall health indicators have improved in the last few decades, these gains have been skewed in favour of some. Over the years, a better health system has, for instance, helped increase life expectancy, but outcomes have varied across gender, caste and income levels, shows the Oxfam India report. Sample this:

  • The rich, on an average, live seven-and-a-half years more than the poor
  • A woman from the general category lives, on an average, 15 years longer than a Dalit woman
  • While there is overall improvement in infant mortality rate (IMR), Dalits, Adivasis and OBCs have higher IMR as compared to the general category. IMR for Adivasis is 44.4, which is 40 per cent more than the general category and 10 per cent more than the national average.

The report recommends implementation of universal health coverage (UHC) supported by a strong public health sector. Marginalised communities also face a disproportionate burden of out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) on health. According to government estimates, 60 million people are pushed into poverty every year due to healthcare expenditure.

“Even after one year into the pandemic and facing two Covid-19 waves, (the) government of India has repeated its failure to allocate 2.5 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) for health,” said Anjela Taneja, Inequality, Health & Education lead Oxfam India.

chart

In Oxfam’s “Commitment to Reducing Inequality Report 2020”, India ranks 154th in health spending, fifth from the bottom. In the 2021-22 Union Budget, a year following a pandemic, the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare (MoHFW) was allocated a total of Rs 76,901 crore, a decline of 9.8 per cent from Rs 85,250 crore from the Revised Estimates of 2020-21.

Oxfam India findings show that higher public health allocations have a positive effect on health outcomes in a pandemic. State governments with higher expenditure on health had lower confirmed cases of Covid-19. States such as Odisha and Goa, with higher expenditure on health, also had higher recovery rate from Covid-19.

The report also finds that the limited scope and coverage of insurance schemes instituted by state and Union governments cannot address the all-encompassing requirements of UHC. Data decently obtained through Right to Information (RTI) showed that only 19 people got Covid-19 treatment under the Union government’s Ayushman Bharat in Bihar, one of the worst affected states during the second wave, said the report.

Seven-state survey on health inequalities during Covid-19

A primary survey of 768 respondents by Oxfam India, with Covid-19 or having recovered from Covid-19, showed the following:

  • Percentage of respondents in higher income groups who had to arrange for transport themselves was half of those in low-income groups.
  • Percentage of respondents in low-income brackets facing discrimination in the community due to being Covid positive was five times than those in high income brackets.
  • Over 50 per cent of SCs and STs faced difficulties in accessing non-Covid medical facilities compared to 18.2 per cent in the general category.
  • Percentage of SCs using an unsafe source of water was three times that of the general category for open wells, and four times for open springs or streams.
  • Among female respondents, 33.9 per cent experienced anxiety, irritation and anger, and sleep deprivation during the lockdown as compared to 18.2 per cent males.


Dear Reader,


Business Standard has always strived hard to provide up-to-date information and commentary on developments that are of interest to you and have wider political and economic implications for the country and the world. Your encouragement and constant feedback on how to improve our offering have only made our resolve and commitment to these ideals stronger. Even during these difficult times arising out of Covid-19, we continue to remain committed to keeping you informed and updated with credible news, authoritative views and incisive commentary on topical issues of relevance.


We, however, have a request.

As we battle the economic impact of the pandemic, we need your support even more, so that we can continue to offer you more quality content. Our subscription model has seen an encouraging response from many of you, who have subscribed to our online content. More subscription to our online content can only help us achieve the goals of offering you even better and more relevant content. We believe in free, fair and credible journalism. Your support through more subscriptions can help us practise the journalism to which we are committed.

Support quality journalism and subscribe to Business Standard.

Digital Editor